GAZA MUSLIM CLERIC HATE
Gaza families say Hamas-affiliated Muslim clerics raped their children and intimidated them into silence
APR 26, 2026 3:00 PM
BY ROBERT SPENCER
In seeing children in a
sexual manner, these Muslim clerics are imitating their prophet.
Islamic tradition records that Muhammad consummated his marriage with
(i.e., raped) Aisha when she was nine, and the resultant fact that
child marriage and the sexualization of children are taken for granted
in wide swaths of the Islamic world.
“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six
years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine
years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his
death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).
Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:
The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to
Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got
ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother,
Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my
girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she
wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the
door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became
all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it.
Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari
women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.”
Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage).
Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother
handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of
age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).
Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old. Nowadays in the West
there are elaborate efforts to deny all this. An Islamic
scholar/apologist named Joshua Little has constructed an elaborate
argument from close study of the chains of transmitters (isnads) of
various traditions about Aisha, claiming that those traditions, despite
appearing in Sahih Bukhari, the hadith collection Muslims consider most
reliable, are actually inauthentic. Little’s argument, however, is
absurd and self-contradictory. He acknowledges that the hadiths are
late and unreliable from a historical standpoint, and even admits that
the chains of transmitters, like the stories themselves, were freely
forged. Then he bases his whole argument for the traditions being
inauthentic even on Islamic grounds on the basis of the isnads that he
just admitted could be forged. He claims to be able to determine the
age of various traditions by how they were forged, but here is argument
is so conjectural and subjective as to be essentially worthless.
Little is also a standard-issue lemming academic. He denounces people
he calls “Islamophobes” for making much of Muhammad’s marriage to
Aisha. He ignores the primary reason why anyone cares about this: not
because, as he claims, “Islamophobes” contend that Muhammad’s example
forces Muslims to condone child marriage, but because all too many
Islamic authorities do condone child marriage. In April 2011, the
Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass
a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a
bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage
of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the
prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam
permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will
ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to
women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice
their lives for any law restricting child marriage.
Turkey’s directorate of religious affairs (Diyanet) said in January
2018 that under Islamic law, girls as young as nine can marry.
“Islam has no age barrier in marriage and Muslims have no apology for
those who refuse to accept this” — Ishaq Akintola, professor of Islamic
Eschatology and Director of Muslim Rights Concern, Nigeria
“There is no minimum marriage age for either men or women in Islamic
law. The law in many countries permits girls to marry only from the age
of 18. This is arbitrary legislation, not Islamic law.” — Dr. Abd
Al-Hamid Al-‘Ubeidi, Iraqi expert on Islamic law
There is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married
“even if they are in the cradle.” — Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, prominent
cleric and member of Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council
“Islam does not forbid marriage of young children.” — Pakistan’s Council of Islamic Ideology
“Gaza families say their children have been ‘raped by Hamas-affiliated
clerics’, with the parents then intimidated into silence,” by Natalie
Lisbona, Daily Mail, April 26, 2026:
Children in Gaza are being raped and then blackmailed into joining
Hamas or having their sexual abuse made public, investigators in the
enclave say.
The Daily Mail has obtained filmed testimony from Jusoor News in Gaza showing the children’s disturbing allegations.
In the video, two boys aged just nine and ten anonymously describe every parent’s worst nightmare.
‘I went to pray at the mosque that day, it was before the ‘asr prayer,
I was studying the Quran,’ says the nine-year-old before naming the
Sheikh that was there.
‘We were studying the Qur’an together. He said to me, “come with me, I want to give you something nice”.
‘He took me to the restrooms and undressed me, took off my pants and had his way with me. I started to scream and then I cried.’
The man then warned him not to tell his father….
Another father, a 39-year-old resident of Deir al-Balah, testified that his son was molested by an Imam.
The Imam was purportedly educating his son while harassing him and other children.
‘The stuff is disgusting, I don’t want to repeat it more than is necessary,’ he said in an audio recording.
When he presented his proof to Hamas security, they forced him to
withdraw the charges by threatening to frame him as an Israeli
collaborator if he didn’t back down….
Gaza mosque welcomes London attacks
Preacher welcomes the “blessed acts” that took place recently in Iraq and
Britain; highlights their proximity to selection of Olympic host for 2012 games
By Roee Nahimas
GAZA - In a reaction similar to the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks in New York,
the blood spilt in the London terror attacks has been celebrated within the
Palestinian territories.
The Gaza based
Sut Al Quds radio station, which identifies itself with Palestinian Islamic
Jihad, has praised the London terrorist atrocities. The broadcast was carried
live on Saturday evening, two days after the attack. The radio station was
broadcasting a sermon, in which a preacher was inciting listeners against Israel
and the Palestinian Authority. The preacher criticized Israel’s planned Gaza
withdrawal, saying that Jerusalem was not part of the program.
The Palestinian Authority was described as
vile for opening up a casino in Jericho. Also in the same broadcast, Osama Bin
Laden was praised, while the succession of explosions in London were welcomed.
The preacher welcomed the “blessed acts”
that took place recently in Iraq and Britain, and highlighted their proximity to
the selection of an Olympic host for the 2012 games. “The sounds of happiness
were heard in London, and Osama Bin Laden came and redrew the map. He made sure
that the voice of the surrendered will be heard in every place,” the mosque's
preacher said.
The sermon was
translated by the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center , which
emphasized that mosques under the jurisdiction of the Palestinian Authority
routinely incited for murder, and were being used by a variety of organizations
with no effective supervision by the Authority.